Every qubit is characterized by a hierarchy of timescales that quantify how long quantum information survives. Understanding the relationships between , , , and is essential for diagnosing noise sources, comparing qubit technologies, and predicting gate fidelities.
The Timescales
— Energy relaxation time
characterizes the rate at which an excited qubit decays to the ground state, releasing energy to the environment. It is measured by preparing and monitoring the probability of finding as a function of delay time:
is set by the coupling between the qubit and dissipative channels (dielectric loss, quasiparticle tunneling, radiative decay, phonon emission, etc.). It represents an irreversible loss of both energy and information.
— Pure dephasing time
characterizes the rate at which the relative phase between and randomizes due to fluctuations in the qubit transition frequency, without energy exchange. If the qubit frequency fluctuates as , then the accumulated phase noise is:
(for Markovian noise; the decay envelope can be Gaussian for noise).
— Free induction decay time (Ramsey)
is measured in a Ramsey experiment: pulse — free evolution for time — pulse. The fringe visibility decays as:
includes contributions from both relaxation and dephasing, and is also degraded by slow, quasi-static frequency fluctuations (e.g., flux noise, magnetic field drift).
— Echo (Hahn or CPMG) coherence time
is measured by inserting a refocusing pulse (Hahn echo) or a train of pulses (CPMG, XY- dynamical decoupling) between the Ramsey pulses. The echo refocuses quasi-static phase accumulation, making sensitive only to noise at frequencies .
Fundamental Relations
The total dephasing rate is the sum of the relaxation-induced dephasing rate and the pure dephasing rate:
This gives the fundamental bound:
The factor of 2 arises because relaxation destroys coherence (the off-diagonal density matrix element ) at half the rate it destroys population ().
The hierarchy in practice is:
with each successive measurement filtering out more low-frequency noise.
Noise Spectroscopy Connection
The relationship between coherence times and the noise power spectral density is:
- : Set by , the noise spectral density at the qubit frequency:
- : Set by , the low-frequency noise:
- vs. : is sensitive to noise at all frequencies below ; echo sequences act as bandpass filters centered at where is the inter-pulse spacing.
For noise (), the Ramsey decay is Gaussian () while the Hahn echo decay is typically or exponential, depending on the noise spectrum details.
Dynamical Decoupling
Echo and dynamical decoupling sequences extend coherence by filtering out low-frequency noise. A CPMG sequence with equally spaced pulses over total time creates a filter function peaked at :
This suppresses noise at frequencies , effectively moving the sensitivity window to higher frequencies where is typically smaller. More pulses → higher effective , up to the limit.
Platform Comparison
| Platform | (echo) | Dominant noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transmon | 100–300 μs | 50–150 μs | 100–500 μs | 0.5–0.9 | Dielectric TLS, QP |
| Fluxonium | 100 μs–1 ms | 10–100 μs | 100 μs–1 ms | 0.3–0.9 | Flux noise (away from sweet spot) |
| ion | >10 s | 1–10 s | >10 min | ~1.0 | Magnetic field fluctuations |
| NV center | 1–10 ms | 1–100 μs | 0.1–1 ms | 0.05–0.1 | C spin bath |
| Si spin qubit | 1–10 s | 1–100 μs | 1–10 ms | <0.01 | Charge noise, nuclear spins |
Historical Context
- Hahn (1950) introduced the spin echo in NMR, the precursor to measurement.
- Carr & Purcell (1954) and Meiboom & Gill (1958) developed multi-pulse decoupling (CPMG).
- Ithier et al. (2005) performed the first comprehensive noise spectroscopy of a superconducting qubit using , , and .
- Bylander et al. (2011) demonstrated CPMG noise spectroscopy in transmons.