Figure

Description
The ytterbium-171 hyperfine qubit encodes quantum information in the two hyperfine clock states of the ion’s ground-state manifold: and , separated by 12.642812 GHz. Because both states have , the qubit is first-order insensitive to magnetic-field noise, and the transition frequency shifts only quadratically with near zero field.
The ion has nuclear spin and a simple ground-state hyperfine structure, which makes state preparation, microwave control, Raman control, and fluorescence readout comparatively clean. The main detection and cooling transition is at 369.5 nm, with 935 nm repumping through the manifold. This combination of clock-state robustness, simple level structure, and high-quality optical control made the workhorse qubit species for commercial trapped-ion systems such as Quantinuum’s H-series processors.
Two-qubit entangling gates use shared motional modes of the ion chain, typically via Raman-driven geometric-phase or Mølmer-Sørensen-type interactions. In modern commercial systems, has also been combined with other ion species in dual-species architectures, where ytterbium provides sympathetic cooling or auxiliary functionality even when another species carries the data qubits.
Hamiltonian
A more complete ground-manifold Hamiltonian is
where is the magnetic-dipole hyperfine constant, is the nuclear spin, is the electronic angular momentum, and is an external magnetic field.
For , , giving the ground-state hyperfine splitting
The full field dependence is given by the Breit-Rabi formula. Near , the clock transition has no first-order Zeeman shift, so
with (equivalently about ). By contrast, the states acquire approximately linear Zeeman shifts at low field.
Motivation
Trapped-ion quantum computing needs qubits with long coherence, clean state preparation and measurement, and control compatible with high-fidelity microwave and laser operations. The clock-state qubit satisfies all three. It supports hour-scale coherence under dynamical decoupling, microsecond single-qubit gates, high-fidelity fluorescence readout, and reliable transport in QCCD architectures. Those properties are exactly why it became one of the dominant trapped-ion qubit implementations in both laboratory and commercial systems.
Experimental Status
First characterization, Olmschenk et al. (2007):
- Demonstrated manipulation and detection of a trapped hyperfine qubit.
- Established the canonical clock-state encoding and fluorescence-readout workflow.
Microwave control scaling, Shappert et al. (2013):
- Demonstrated spatially uniform microwave single-qubit control in a surface-electrode trap.
- Achieved -rotations as fast as about 1 s on the hyperfine transition.
Fast high-fidelity readout, Noek et al. (2013):
- Demonstrated 99.93% state-preparation-and-measurement fidelity for a hyperfine qubit.
- Used background-suppressed fluorescence detection on the 369.5 nm cycling transition.
Transport robustness, Kaufmann et al. (2018):
- Measured 99.9994% state fidelity per shuttling operation during repeated transport of a hyperfine qubit.
- Important evidence that QCCD transport can preserve hyperfine-qubit information with negligible added error.
Long coherence, Wang et al. (2021):
- Demonstrated a single-ion qubit with estimated coherence time exceeding one hour under dynamical decoupling.
- Showed how magnetic-noise suppression and sympathetic-cooling support can push physical clock-state coherence far beyond the raw limit.
Integrated-control fidelity, Hogle et al. (2023):
- Demonstrated single-qubit gate fidelities above 99.7% using scalable integrated photonic modulators.
- Relevant because it connects high-fidelity qubit control to an architecture compatible with large-scale optical fanout.
System-level deployment, Quantinuum H2 (2024):
- Quantinuum’s H2 processor used a fully connected QCCD register for logical-qubit and error-correction experiments.
- This includes the 4D surface-code demonstration on a commercial trapped-ion processor.
Ultra-long encoded coherence, Pi et al. (2026):
- Reported coherence beyond ten hours in a decoherence-free clock-qubit encoding built from a pair of ions.
- Shows that ytterbium clock qubits remain a leading platform for long-lived trapped-ion quantum memory.
Key Metrics
| Metric | Value | Notes | Fidelity reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effectively infinite on circuit timescales | Ground-state hyperfine qubit | — | |
| Hyperfine splitting | 12.642812 GHz | Clock transition in | Olmschenk et al. 2007 |
| (single ion, DD) | >1 h | Best reported single-ion coherence under dynamical decoupling | Wang et al. 2021 |
| (DFS pair) | >10 h | Pair-encoded decoherence-free clock qubit | Pi et al. 2026 |
| 1Q gate fidelity | >99.7% | Gate set tomography with integrated photonic modulators | Hogle et al. 2023 |
| SPAM fidelity | 99.93% | Background-suppressed fluorescence detection | Noek et al. 2013 |
| 1Q gate time | ~1 s | Microwave-driven rotations | Shappert et al. 2013 |
| Transport fidelity | 99.9994% per hop | 280 m shuttling operation in a microstructured trap | Kaufmann et al. 2018 |
| System scale | 56 qubits (H2, 2024) | Commercial all-to-all QCCD register | Berthusen et al. 2024 |
References
Original characterization
- S. Olmschenk et al., “Manipulation and detection of a trapped Yb⁺ hyperfine qubit,” Phys. Rev. A 76, 052314 (2007), arXiv:0708.0657
Control, transport, and readout
- C. M. Shappert et al., “Spatially uniform single-qubit gate operations with near-field microwaves and composite pulse compensation,” New J. Phys. 15, 083053 (2013), arXiv:1304.6636
- R. Noek et al., “High speed, high fidelity detection of an atomic hyperfine qubit,” Opt. Lett. 38, 4735 (2013)
- P. Kaufmann et al., “High-Fidelity Preservation of Quantum Information During Trapped-Ion Transport,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 010501 (2018), arXiv:1704.02141
Coherence and integrated control
- P. Wang et al., “Single ion qubit with estimated coherence time exceeding one hour,” Nat. Commun. 12, 233 (2021)
- C. W. Hogle et al., “High-fidelity trapped-ion qubit operations with scalable photonic modulators,” npj Quantum Information (2023)
- J. Pi et al., “Beyond-Ten-Hour Coherence in a Decoherence-Free Trapped-Ion Clock Qubit,” arXiv:2603.19631 (2026)
System-level deployment
- N. Berthusen et al., “Experiments with the four-dimensional surface code on a quantum charge-coupled device quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. A 110, 062413 (2024), arXiv:2408.08865
- A. Ransford et al., “A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer,” arXiv:2511.05465 (2025)
Linked Papers
Related Entries
- trapped-ion-qubit — parent platform
- shuttling-ion-trap-qubit — QCCD transport architecture used in scalable ion processors
- cirac-zoller-gate — foundational trapped-ion gate proposal
- motional-mode-coupling-in-ion-traps — physics of the Coulomb-mediated bus
- coherence-time-hierarchy — context for coherence comparison